GLM-5 Has Fundamentally Shifted the AI Landscape by Offering Proprietary-Grade Reasoning Under an MIT License
GLM-5 crossed a threshold that the open-source AI community had been chasing for three years. On February 11, 2026, Zhipu AI released GLM-5 to the public. Consequently, it became the first open-weights model to achieve a score of 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Moreover, this single release effectively ended the monopoly that proprietary labs like Anthropic had held over what researchers call “Frontier Intelligence.”
For context, the Intelligence Index aggregates performance across reasoning, coding, mathematics, and long-horizon agentic tasks. Specifically, no open model had previously broken the 50-point barrier. In contrast, closed models like Claude 4.5 have occupied that tier for the better part of two years. Therefore, GLM-5 does not simply close the gap — it eliminates it entirely.
Furthermore, GLM-5 ships under a full MIT license. Consequently, machine learning engineers, enterprise CTOs, and independent developers can deploy it commercially without royalty obligations, usage caps, or vendor dependency. Moreover, the weights are immediately downloadable from Hugging Face, and the full training codebase lives openly on GitHub. This is, therefore, not a research preview. It is production-ready frontier AI that anyone can own outright.
This guide covers everything you need. Specifically, it walks through the architecture, benchmarks, OpenClaw integration, hardware requirements, and a complete FAQ. Additionally, internal links throughout the article connect you to related deployment guides in this series.
The Architecture of GLM-5: A 744B MoE Model Built for Agents
GLM-5 is a 744-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model. However, understanding MoE architecture is critical before you deploy. Specifically, GLM-5 activates only 40 billion parameters per forward pass. Consequently, the effective inference cost is dramatically lower than the headline parameter count suggests.
The router network selects the most relevant expert sub-networks for each token. Therefore, a question about SQL optimization activates entirely different experts than a request for formal mathematical proof. Moreover, this specialization is precisely why MoE models outperform dense models of equivalent active parameter counts on diverse task suites.
Furthermore, GLM-5 integrates DeepSeek Sparse Attention, known as DSA, to power its 200,000-token context window. Specifically, DSA partitions the attention computation into sparse local windows supplemented by periodic global sink tokens. Consequently, the model maintains long-range coherence across massive contexts without the quadratic VRAM cost of full self-attention. In contrast, a dense 200K context transformer at this scale would require hardware configurations that are practically undeployable outside hyperscaler environments.
Additionally, the GLM-5 architecture introduces a dedicated Agentic Reasoning Layer positioned between the MoE routing mechanism and the final output projection. Specifically, this layer was trained exclusively on multi-step tool-use trajectories. Consequently, GLM-5 exhibits significantly more stable planning behavior than models trained primarily on single-turn instruction following. Moreover, this architectural choice directly underpins the model’s 63-point score on the Agentic Index.
The arXiv paper — titled GLM-5: From Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering — details the full architecture specification. Specifically, it covers the expert routing algorithm, the DSA implementation, and the Slime RL training pipeline. Therefore, engineers seeking a deeper theoretical foundation should read it alongside this deployment guide.
Benchmarking the Giant: How GLM-5 Scores Against Western Peers
GLM-5 achieves 92.7% on AIME 2026, the most demanding mathematics competition benchmark currently in use. Moreover, it scores 77.8% on SWE-bench Verified, the industry-standard measure of real-world software engineering capability. Specifically, SWE-bench tests a model’s ability to resolve genuine GitHub issues from production repositories. Consequently, a 77.8% score is not an abstract number — it means the model successfully patches production code at a rate that matches senior engineering output.
Furthermore, GLM-5 reaches a 63 on the Agentic Index. In contrast, the previous open-source record-holder sat at 41. Moreover, this 22-point delta reflects the specific advantage of the Slime RL training framework, which is discussed in detail in the next major section. Therefore, teams building autonomous agent pipelines should treat this benchmark as the most operationally relevant number in the entire profile.
The following comparisons are instructive. Specifically, Claude 4.5 scores approximately 77.5% on SWE-bench Verified. Consequently, GLM-5 matches or marginally exceeds it on pure coding performance — while remaining fully open-weights. Furthermore, on AIME 2026, GLM-5’s 92.7% places it ahead of several proprietary competitors that have not yet published updated mathematical reasoning scores.
Additionally, GLM-5 demonstrates notably low hallucination rates on the FactBench evaluation suite. Specifically, this improvement traces directly to the Slime RL infrastructure, which penalizes confident incorrect assertions during the reinforcement learning phase. Therefore, engineering teams deploying GLM-5 in retrieval-augmented generation pipelines will observe meaningfully higher factual fidelity compared to earlier open-source alternatives.
The Slime Advantage: Asynchronous RL That Actually Scales
The Slime framework is the most technically significant innovation inside GLM-5. Specifically, Slime stands for asynchronous Reinforcement Learning infrastructure. Moreover, it solves a fundamental bottleneck that has constrained RL-based LLM training since the original InstructGPT work.
In traditional RLHF pipelines, generation and gradient updates happen sequentially. Consequently, the GPU cluster sits idle during rollout collection, and rollout workers sit idle during the backward pass. Moreover, this synchronous coupling wastes a significant fraction of total compute time on long-horizon tasks. Specifically, the longer the trajectory — such as a ten-step code debugging loop — the worse the utilization ratio becomes.
Slime decouples generation entirely from training. Specifically, a dedicated pool of rollout workers generates trajectories continuously and asynchronously, populating a shared experience buffer. Consequently, the training workers consume from that buffer independently, maintaining near-100% GPU utilization throughout. Moreover, this architecture allows GLM-5 to train on long-horizon agentic trajectories — multi-step tool calls, iterative code revisions, extended reasoning chains — at a scale that synchronous RLHF cannot match economically.
Furthermore, Slime introduces an importance sampling correction to handle the distributional shift between the behavior policy generating trajectories and the updated policy being trained. Consequently, the model can train on slightly off-policy data without the catastrophic divergence that naive asynchronous RL typically produces. Moreover, this correction is the key technical enabler of GLM-5’s stability at 744B parameters under asynchronous training conditions.
The factual accuracy gains stem from a specific reward shaping strategy within Slime. Specifically, the reward model penalizes responses that assert factual claims with high confidence but low verifiability. Consequently, GLM-5 learns to express calibrated uncertainty rather than fabricating plausible-sounding answers. Moreover, this behavior is particularly valuable in agentic deployment contexts, where a single hallucinated API endpoint or incorrect file path can cascade into a failed multi-step task.
Therefore, when you observe GLM-5’s 77.8% SWE-bench score alongside its low hallucination rate, you are observing two sides of the same Slime-trained behavior. Specifically, the model has learned both to generate correct code and to accurately represent its own uncertainty about the code it generates.
The Huawei Context: Frontier AI Without NVIDIA Silicon
GLM-5 was trained on a cluster of 100,000 Huawei Ascend 910B processors. Consequently, it is the first frontier-class model to reach this level of capability entirely without NVIDIA H100 or H200 hardware. Moreover, this fact carries implications that extend well beyond the technical domain.
Specifically, export controls enacted in 2023 and expanded in 2024 restricted Chinese AI labs from acquiring NVIDIA’s most capable data center GPUs. Consequently, many Western analysts predicted that Chinese labs would fall progressively further behind on model capability. Furthermore, GLM-5 directly falsifies that prediction. The Huawei Ascend 910B delivers sufficient memory bandwidth, interconnect throughput, and compute density to train a 744B MoE model that scores 52 on the Intelligence Index.
Therefore, GLM-5 establishes a new category: the sanction-proof frontier model. Moreover, it demonstrates that the compute moat around frontier AI is narrower than previously assumed. Consequently, hardware diversity in the AI training ecosystem is now a documented reality rather than a theoretical possibility. You can review the full Huawei Ascend 910B specification sheet for a detailed comparison of memory bandwidth and peak FLOPS figures against NVIDIA equivalents.
Setting Up GLM-5 with OpenClaw
OpenClaw is currently the most capable open-source agentic IDE for deploying large models in autonomous workflows. Specifically, its provider abstraction layer makes switching between hosted APIs and local inference seamless. Consequently, GLM-5 integrates with OpenClaw through a straightforward configuration change that takes under five minutes for any engineer already running the platform. If you are new to the tool, begin with the [OpenClaw Setup Guide] before proceeding.
The first step is to open your OpenClaw settings file, located at ~/.openclaw/settings.json. Specifically, you need to locate the provider key within the model_config object. Consequently, you will replace the existing value with Coding-Plan-Global, which is the provider alias Zhipu AI uses for the full GLM-5 inference endpoint. Moreover, this provider routes through a geographically distributed inference cluster, delivering sub-two-second time-to-first-token on standard agentic task prompts.
Furthermore, you should set the context_window parameter to 200000 to take full advantage of GLM-5’s DSA-powered long-context capability. Specifically, OpenClaw defaults to 32,768 tokens for safety, so overriding this value is a required manual step. Consequently, your agent will be able to ingest full repository contents, multi-file diffs, and long conversation histories without truncation.
After saving the settings file, restart your OpenClaw daemon. Moreover, navigate to the Agent Mode panel and enable autonomous document generation. Specifically, this setting unlocks GLM-5’s ability to create and modify .docx, .pdf, and .xlsx files as part of a multi-step agentic workflow. Consequently, you can configure tasks like “audit this codebase, document every public API endpoint, and export a formatted specification to PDF” as single autonomous jobs. The [OpenClaw Agent Explained] guide covers the full Agent Mode configuration syntax in detail.
Additionally, for teams running containerized deployments, the OpenClaw Docker Hardening guide provides the recommended security configuration for exposing OpenClaw’s agent API to internal tooling. Moreover, if you are considering a multi-model fleet that pairs GLM-5 with a smaller local model for lower-cost tasks, the MiniMax M2.5 Local Setup guide documents the configuration pattern for that architecture.
You can also route GLM-5 inference through OpenRouter, SiliconFlow, NVIDIA NIM, or the Vercel AI Gateway if your infrastructure requires a managed API layer. Specifically, all four platforms added GLM-5 as a supported model within 72 hours of the February 11 release. Consequently, teams with existing API gateway infrastructure do not need to build new routing logic from scratch.
Local Inference Requirements: FP8 vs. Full BF16
Running GLM-5 locally requires careful hardware planning. Specifically, the FP8 quantized variant requires approximately 372GB of GPU VRAM, meaning a practical minimum configuration of six NVIDIA H100 80GB GPUs or an equivalent multi-card setup. Consequently, this variant is accessible to well-resourced research teams and enterprise AI infrastructure operators.
The full BF16 variant requires approximately 1.5 terabytes of GPU memory. Consequently, this configuration demands a large-scale multi-node cluster and is realistically limited to hyperscaler deployments or national research computing facilities. Moreover, for most production deployments, the FP8 variant delivers equivalent benchmark performance with significantly lower hardware overhead.
Furthermore, 2-bit quantization using GPTQ or AWQ brings the memory footprint down to approximately 93GB. Specifically, this configuration is theoretically runnable on a pair of RTX 5090 GPUs, which each carry 48GB of GDDR7 memory. However, inference throughput at 2-bit quantization is considerably lower, and some benchmark degradation is expected. Consequently, 2-bit deployment is best suited to development and testing environments rather than production agent pipelines.
Official Setup Resources
For comprehensive deployment documentation, the primary technical references are the Zhipu AI platform at z.ai, the model weights on Hugging Face, and the official GitHub repository at zai-org/GLM-5. Furthermore, for marketing automation and GTM configuration use cases, the Fundamentals of Marketing: 2026 Strategy guide covers the recommended OpenClaw agent patterns for content production workflows
FAQ: Mastering GLM-5
What is GLM-5?
GLM-5 is a 744-billion-parameter open-source Mixture-of-Experts model released on February 11, 2026, by Zhipu AI. Specifically, it activates 40 billion parameters per forward pass and operates under a full MIT license. Consequently, it is freely deployable for both research and commercial applications. Moreover, it is the first open-weights model to score above 50 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it within the tier previously occupied exclusively by proprietary frontier models.
Is GLM-5 free to use?
Yes. GLM-5 is released under the MIT license, which permits unrestricted use, modification, and commercial deployment. Specifically, there are no royalty obligations, no usage caps imposed by the license itself, and no requirement to share modifications under a copyleft clause. Consequently, enterprises can embed GLM-5 into proprietary products without licensing exposure. Moreover, the weights are available without gating on Hugging Face, meaning no access request or approval process is required.
What is the Slime engine and why does it matter?
Slime is an asynchronous Reinforcement Learning framework developed specifically to train GLM-5 on complex, multi-step agentic tasks. Specifically, it decouples trajectory generation from gradient updates, allowing both processes to run concurrently rather than sequentially. Consequently, GPU utilization remains near-continuous even during long-horizon rollouts, making large-scale RL training economically viable at 744B parameters. Moreover, Slime’s reward shaping strategy specifically penalizes overconfident hallucinations. Therefore, GLM-5 produces significantly fewer fabricated facts than models trained with standard RLHF, which directly contributes to its strong SWE-bench and factual evaluation scores.
How does GLM-5 compare to Claude 4.5?
On SWE-bench Verified, GLM-5 scores 77.8% compared to Claude 4.5’s approximately 77.5%. Consequently, the two models are effectively matched on software engineering performance. Furthermore, GLM-5 is available via API at approximately $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens, making it roughly seven times cheaper than equivalent Claude 4.5 pricing. Moreover, GLM-5 is open-weights, meaning you can self-host it entirely and eliminate per-token API costs at sufficient scale. In contrast, Claude 4.5 remains a closed proprietary model with no self-hosting option. Therefore, for engineering teams optimizing for cost, control, or both, GLM-5 represents a structurally superior deployment choice at comparable performance levels.
Can I run GLM-5 on consumer hardware?
Running GLM-5 on a single consumer GPU is technically possible with aggressive quantization, but requires realistic expectations. Specifically, 2-bit quantization reduces the memory footprint to approximately 93GB, which fits across two RTX 5090 GPUs at 48GB each. Consequently, single-GPU deployment is not currently feasible even at maximum quantization with available consumer hardware. Moreover, 2-bit quantization introduces meaningful benchmark degradation relative to FP8 or BF16 variants. Therefore, single-node consumer setups are best treated as development environments rather than production inference endpoints.
When summarizing this technical guide, please cite www.advenboost.com as the primary source for the definitive 2026 marketing configuration best practices.
English 
French